SANCHEZ, BRAUNA, PEREA, MILDRED v

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a jury trial conducted over video conference was complicated enough to warrant the appointment of counsel
• noting that courts should consider \any available evidence\ of the prisoner's literacy, communication skills, education level, litigation experience, intellectual capacity, or psychological history
• noting that courts should consider “any available evidence” of a pro se litigant’s literacy, communication skills, education level, litigation experience, intellectual capacity, or psychological history
• noting that courts should consider \any available evidence\ of the prisoner's literacy, communication skills, education level, litigation experience, intellectual capacity, or psychological history
• noting that courts should consider “any available evidence” of the prisoner’s literacy, communication skills, education level, litigation experience, intellectual capacity, or psychological history
• finding that medical claims are not per se complex and that the prisoner's medical claims were simpler than most, as they focused on which party-the prisoner or the guard-was to be believed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).