Skip to main content
· 3/18/1998

San Rafael Baking Co. v. Northern California Bakery Drivers Security Fund (In Re San Rafael Baking Co.)

Citations

  • 219 B.R. 860
  • 98 Daily Journal DAR 3487
  • 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2462
  • 1998 Bankr. LEXIS 367
  • 32 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 509
  • 1998 WL 154726

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that bankruptcy court had no jurisdiction to award benefit payments under an expired collective bargaining agreement, and allowing an administrative claim only for benefits that accrued during month between filing of petition and expiration of labor contract
  • “Bankruptcy courts are 10 courts of equity but must follow the law and cannot ignore 11 express statutory commands.”
  • “Bankruptcy courts are courts of equity but must follow the law and cannot ignore express statutory commands.”
  • “Bankruptcy courts are 10 courts of equity but must follow the law and cannot ignore 11 express statutory commands.”
  • all holding that section 1113 is only applicable where a collective bargaining agreement exists at the time the Chapter 11 case is filed
  • in the context of a claims hearing, only the NLRB had the authority to interpret the NLRA and bankruptcy court did not have authority to alter an expired agreement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hagan, Ollason, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.