Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding standing of hotel ownérs in suit alleging that the City interfered with the housing rights of the mentally ill
• under 28 U.S.C.§§ 1367(c)(1), a district court may decline supplemental jurisdiction over novel pendent state law claims
• district court not required to provide explanation when declining jurisdiction under §§ 1367 (c)(3)
• “In providing notice to the parties, ‘a district court need 25 only apprise the parties that it will look beyond the pleadings to extrinsic evidence and give them 26 an opportunity to supplement the record.’” (citation omitted)
• setting forth elements of a retaliation claim under the FHA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).