San-Nap-Pak Manufacturing Co. v. Firemen's Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prosecutor’s abuse of subpoena power in procuring defendant’s arrest clothes from prison did not state a claim under the Fourth Amendment
• noting, under New York law, “[i]t is for the court, not the prosecutor, to determine where subpoenaed materials should be deposited”
• “where the District Attorney seeks trial evidence the subpoena should be made returnable to the court”
• “[B]y statute it is the District Attorney who issues a subpoena duces tecum.” (citing N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law § 610.25(1
• both searches and seizures may be conducted at precinct upon arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).