San Jose Canning Co. v. Oneal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff did not reasonably rely on representations of the defendant because it could have discovered the truth through the exercise of due diligence
• holding that no special relationship exists in a banking relationship generally
• highlighting the general rule that “banking relationships are not viewed as special relationships giving rise to a heightened duty of care”
• analyzing elements in context of claim for rescission based on fraud
• “since the participation agreement expressly recited that Banque Arabe would not rely on information from MNB,” reliance is not justifiable
• under New York law, party asserting fraud must prove it by clear and convincing evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).