· 8/24/1989
San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District v. The United States
Citations
- 877 F.2d 957
- 1989 WL 59813
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that a plaintiff states a claim for breach of contract by identifying a duty arising out of that contract and alleging facts sufficient to show a breach of that duty
- explaining that a breach-of-contract claim requires, among other things, a duty or obligation to perform
- noting that to state a claim for breach of contract, a plaintiff in this court must allege that the contract imposed a duty on the government and that the government breached that duty
- finding that a plaintiff “must allege and establish” all four elements to recover
- noting that in order to recover for an alleged breach of contract, a plaintiff must establish, among other things, “an obligation or duty arising out of the contract” and a “breach of that duty”
- stating that a breach of contract claim requires: “(1) a valid contract between the parties, (2) an obligation or duty arising out of the contract, (3) a breach of that duty, and (4) damages caused by the breach”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Friedman, Miller, Bissell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.