Skip to main content
· 8/24/1989

San Carlos Irrigation and Drainage District v. The United States

Citations

  • 877 F.2d 957
  • 1989 WL 59813

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that a plaintiff states a claim for breach of contract by identifying a duty arising out of that contract and alleging facts sufficient to show a breach of that duty
  • explaining that a breach-of-contract claim requires, among other things, a duty or obligation to perform
  • noting that to state a claim for breach of contract, a plaintiff in this court must allege that the contract imposed a duty on the government and that the government breached that duty
  • finding that a plaintiff “must allege and establish” all four elements to recover
  • noting that in order to recover for an alleged breach of contract, a plaintiff must establish, among other things, “an obligation or duty arising out of the contract” and a “breach of that duty”
  • stating that a breach of contract claim requires: “(1) a valid contract between the parties, (2) an obligation or duty arising out of the contract, (3) a breach of that duty, and (4) damages caused by the breach”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friedman, Miller, Bissell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.