Skip to main content
· 8/25/2003

San Antonio Credit Union v. O'CONNOR

Citations

  • 115 S.W.3d 82
  • 2003 WL 21502765

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the discovery rule applied to a criminal complaint that by nature was \difficult if not impossible to discover\
  • stating that “an investigation into criminal activity does not amount to a ‘proposed judicial proceeding.’ ”
  • stating that “an investigation into criminal activity does not amount to a ‘proposed judicial proceeding.’”
  • rendering take nothing judgment on attorney’s fees claim, noting claimant relied on contingent fee and did not present evidence “that a specific amount of money was a reasonable attorney’s fees award”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone, Duncan, Angelini

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.