Samuels v. Town of Harrington
Citations
- 43 Wash. 603
- 86 P. 1071
- 1906 Wash. LEXIS 754
Syllabus
<p>Officers — De Facto Officers — Salary—Recovery. A municipality which pays the salary of a de facto officer while he is in possession of the office is not liable to the de jure officer for such salary, on his establishing his right to the office, since reasons of public policy require offices to be filled and prompt payment to be made by the disbursing officers.</p> <p>Election of Remedies — Repudiation—De Facto and De Jure Officers. A de jure officer who has recovered judgment against a de facto officer for the salary paid to him, under Bal. Code, §§ 5785, 5788, has elected his remedy and cannot recover the same from the town on failure to collect the judgment.</p>
Judges: Fullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.