Samuels Group, Inc. v. Hatch Grading & Contracting, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding relatedness of interests “highlighted by the fact that they are represented in the State Proceedings by the same counsel” as in the federal proceedings
• finding relatedness of interests “highlighted by the fact that they are represented in the State Proceedings by the same counsel” as in the federal proceedings
• reviewing cases and holding “that proceedings may be ‘parallel’ for purposes of Colorado River abstention even when the parties to the state and federal proceedings are not completely identical”
• “A stay is preferred to dismissal in cases where there is a possibility that the parties will return to federal court.”
• “A stay is preferred to dismissal in cases where there is a possibility that the parties will return to federal court.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• abstaining where interests of non-identical parties were related

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).