Samuel v. Frohnmayer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an award of attorney fees under Deras was not appropriate
• explaining that Oregon’s declaratory judgments act was based on the UDJA, which was in turn based on the federal Declaratory Judgments Act
• explaining that Oregon’s declaratory judgments act was based on the UDJA, which was in turn based on the federal Declaratory Judgments Act
• \the law has long been settled that such an award may be made only when a statute or contract provides such authority\
• the plaintiff in Deras was seeking no “monetary or other gain peculiar to himself’
• “If recovery of attorney fees is to be based on ORS 182.090, some notice in the form of pleaded facts will be necessary before a court can consider awarding them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).