Samuel v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “conjectural opinion testimony should be excluded under Rule 403 because whatever minimal probative value it may be said to possess clearly is substantially outweighed by the danger of confusion”
• stating that the Federal Rules of Evidence do not require an expert to “affirmatively state that the opinion is held to a ‘reasonable degree of certainty or probability’”
• “[The Federal Rules of Evidence] do not require the expert to testify with absolute certainty, or without any doubt whatsoever.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).