Samuel TAYLOR, and the Class He Represents, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SAFEWAY STORES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming denial of back pay award for period employee abandoned job search in order to “reap greater future earnings” by attending school
• affirming limitation of back pay award to plaintiff who enrolled in school full-time
• affirming limitation of back pay award to plaintiff who enrolled in school full-time
• Plaintiff entered school and court analogized to the rule: “If a discharged employee accepted employment elsewhere, there is little doubt that this would cut off any back pay award.”
• plaintiff must show his training was different from that given to whites
• no fees awarded where plaintiffs claims finally adjudicated to be meritless

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).