Samuel Richard Harrell v. T. M. Keohane, Warden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the constitutional concept of an inmate’s right of access to the courts does not require prison officials to provide an inmate with free or unlimited access to a photocopying machine
• rejecting inmate’s claimed right 8 to “free unlimited access to a photocopying machine” and noting that prison policies must 9 account for “budgetary considerations”
• policy that charged $.10 per copy \does not support a claim of denial of access to the courts\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).