Samuel R. President v. Cyrus R. Vance, Secretary, United States Department of State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a declaratory judgment is appropriate when it will serve a useful purpose in clarifying the legal relations at issue or afford relief from the controversy giving rise to the proceeding
• noting that a declaratory judgment is appropriate when it will serve a useful purpose in clarifying the legal relations at issue or afford relief from the controversy giving rise to the proceeding
• “‘[T]he specific words of the (administrative) charge of discrimination need not presage with literary exactitude the judicial pleadings which may follow.”’ (citation omitted)
• “Title VII’s exhaustion requirement should not be read to create useless procedural technicalities.”
• “Title VII's exhaustion requirement should not be read to create useless procedural technicalities”
• “Title VII’s exhaustion requirement should not be read to create useless procedural technicalities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).