Skip to main content
· 6/22/1999

Samuel R. Pierce

Citations

  • 178 F.3d 1350
  • 336 U.S. App. D.C. 303
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 14166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that there can be no \serious argument\ that duplication occurred because \the Independent Counsel's investigation ranged far beyond the preliminary investigation not only in depth but breadth\
  • stating that there can be no \serious argument\ that duplication occurred because \the Independent Counsel's investigation ranged far beyond the preliminary investigation not only in depth but breadth\
  • stating that there can be no “serious argument” that duplication occurred because “the Independent Counsel’s investigation ranged far beyond the preliminary investigation not only in depth but breadth”
  • stating that there can be no \serious argument\ that duplication occurred because \the Independent Counsel's in- vestigation ranged far beyond the preliminary investigation not only in depth but breadth\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sentelle, Fay, Cudahy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.