· 6/22/1999
Samuel R. Pierce
Citations
- 178 F.3d 1350
- 336 U.S. App. D.C. 303
- 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 14166
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that there can be no \serious argument\ that duplication occurred because \the Independent Counsel's investigation ranged far beyond the preliminary investigation not only in depth but breadth\
- stating that there can be no \serious argument\ that duplication occurred because \the Independent Counsel's investigation ranged far beyond the preliminary investigation not only in depth but breadth\
- stating that there can be no “serious argument” that duplication occurred because “the Independent Counsel’s investigation ranged far beyond the preliminary investigation not only in depth but breadth”
- stating that there can be no \serious argument\ that duplication occurred because \the Independent Counsel's in- vestigation ranged far beyond the preliminary investigation not only in depth but breadth\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sentelle, Fay, Cudahy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.