Skip to main content
· 11/6/2023

Samuel Paz v. City of Tucson

Citations

  • 539 P.3d 906

Syllabus

In denying sanctions under A.R.S. § 12-349(A)(3), did the trial court err by (1) importing a bad conduct requirement and (2) finding no unreasonable delay or expansion of the proceedings, after the City's introduction of evidence in violation of a court order unduly prejudiced the first trial and necessitated a second trial?

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.