Skip to main content
· 4/9/2014

Samuel P. Snell v. The State of Wyoming

Citations

  • 2014 WY 46
  • 322 P.3d 38
  • 2014 WL 1387269
  • 2014 Wyo. LEXIS 53

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to review an issue because the facts relevant to a determination were not developed before the district court
  • “[I]t is necessary that the affidavit include some underlying facts, rather than bare conclusions of the affiant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kite, Hill, Burke, Davis, Fox

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.