Samuel Muriithi v. Shuttle Express, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an arbitration clause may be unenforceable if high arbitration costs effectively prevent access to the arbitral forum
• noting that “Concepcion sweeps ... broadly” to preempt generally applicable contract defenses that “target[] the existence of an agreement to arbitrate as the basis for invalidating that agreement”
• holding that district court erred in resolving challenge to contractual one-year limitations provision on a motion to compel arbitration because the challenge “does not rely on any aspect of the Arbitration Clause, but relates only to the general contract defense itself”
• holding that district court erred in resolving challenge to contractual one-year limitations provision on a motion to compel arbitration because the challenge “does not rely on any aspect of the Arbitration Clause, but relates only to the general contract defense itself”
• holding that district court erred in resolving challenge to contractual one-year limitations provision on a motion to compel arbitration because the challenge “does not rely on any aspect of the Arbitration Clause, but relates only to the general contract defense itself”
• holding district court erred in refusing to uphold arbitration agreement’s class action waiver as unconscionable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).