Samuel J. Cavin v. Honda of America Manufacturing, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] termination based only in part on an absence covered by the FMLA, even in combination with other absences, may still violate the FMLA.”
• ―[A] termination based only in part on an absence covered by the FMLA, even in combination with other absences, may still violate the FMLA.‖ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “a termination based only in part on an absence covered by the FMLA, even in combination with other absences, may still violate the FMLA”
• superseded on other grounds as stated in Srouder v. Dana Light Axle Mfg., LLC, 725 F.3d 608, 615 (6th Cir. 2013)
• “[A] termination based only in part on an absence covered by the FMLA, even in combination with other absences, may still violate the FMLA.”
• “[A] termination based only in part on an absence covered by the FMLA, even in combination with other absences, may still violate the FMLA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).