Samuel HAYNES, SS # 431-78-5306, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the lack of strong pain medication is inconsistent with subjective complaints of disabling pain
• rejecting claimant's argument that the ALJ \did not set forth all of his impairments in the hypothetical question posed to the vocational expert \ when determining that -17- the claimant was \not capable of performing his past relevant work as a security guard\
• “A lack of strong pain medication is inconsistent with subjective complaints of disabling pain.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).