Skip to main content
· 7/20/2005

Samuel H. Myles v. United States

Citations

  • 416 F.3d 551
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14646
  • 2005 WL 1683968

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that to be properly considered a party, a defendant must be “specif[ied] in the caption”
  • holding that to be properly considered a party, a defendant must be specified in the caption
  • holding that to be properly considered a party, a defendant must be “specif[ied] in the caption”
  • holding that to be properly considered a party, a defendant must be “specif[ied] in the caption”
  • holding that to be properly considered a party, a defendant must be “specif[ied] in the caption”
  • holding that to be properly considered a party, a defendant must be “specif[ied] in the caption”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Easterbrook, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.