· 7/20/2005
Samuel H. Myles v. United States
Citations
- 416 F.3d 551
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 14646
- 2005 WL 1683968
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that to be properly considered a party, a defendant must be “specif[ied] in the caption”
- holding that to be properly considered a party, a defendant must be specified in the caption
- holding that to be properly considered a party, a defendant must be “specif[ied] in the caption”
- holding that to be properly considered a party, a defendant must be “specif[ied] in the caption”
- holding that to be properly considered a party, a defendant must be “specif[ied] in the caption”
- holding that to be properly considered a party, a defendant must be “specif[ied] in the caption”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Easterbrook, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.