Skip to main content
· 2/22/2007

Samuel ex rel. Mathis v. Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics, Inc.

Citations

  • 949 So. 2d 1131
  • 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2648
  • 2007 WL 528547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that this court may rephrase certified questions in order to render them more accurate in framing issues presented
  • noting that this court may rephrase certified questions in order to render them more accurate in framing issues presented
  • revising certified questions to include issues that Appellate Court did not reach after this court sua sponte directed parties to brief those issues
  • \Standing is the legal right to set judicial machinery in motion.\ (quoting Tomlinson v. Bd. of Educ., 226 Conn. 704, 717, 629 A.2d 333, 341 (1993))
  • “Standing is the legal right to set judicial machinery in motion.” (quoting Tomlinson v. Bd. of Educ., 226 Conn. 704, 717, 629 A.2d 333, 341 (1993))
  • this court may modify certified questions to render them more accurate in framing issues presented

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lewis, Nortwick, Wolf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.