Skip to main content
· 11/15/2013

Samuel Dustin v. United States

Citations

  • 113 Fed. Cl. 366
  • 2013 U.S. Claims LEXIS 1796
  • 2013 WL 6049070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the VA’s failure to resume repayment of plaintiffs student loans was an “unjustified or unwarranted personnel action”
  • finding court was an appropriate authority to review agency’s failure to continue making plaintiffs student loan payments
  • “Acts of Congress and executive agency regulations which command or can be interpreted to command the payment of money are covered by the Tucker Act and thus trigger the Back Pay Act’s money-mandating effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wheeler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.