Samuel C. Hanna, Cross-Appellee v. American Motors Corporation, Cross-Appellant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff who had enrolled in school, but who applied for and was willing to accept full-time employment, had not failed to mitigate damages
• holding that plaintiff who had enrolled in school, but who applied for and was willing to accept full-time employment, had not failed to mitigate damages
• finding filing applications, reading classified ads, and discussing employment opportunities with friends to be “more than sufficient to constitute reasonable diligence”
• where claimant decided to attend school not to reap greater future earnings, but only to obtain needed income following fruitless job search, duty to mitigate satisfied
• 7% interest awarded on damages accruing from 1973 to 1977

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).