Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Panasonic Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an overt act must be “a new and independent act that is not merely a reaffirmation of a previous act”
• “We have repeatedly held that acts taken to enforce a 27 contract were overt acts that restarted the statute of limitations.”
• “Interpretations of federal antitrust law are at most 18 instructive, not conclusive, when construing the Cartwright Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).