Skip to main content
· 7/20/2006

Sampson v. Town of Salisbury

Citations

  • 441 F. Supp. 2d 271
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49649
  • 2006 WL 2023282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting defendants summary judgment on plaintiffs’ equal-protection claim because plaintiffs had “asserted nothing more than disparaté treatment, which is insufficient to support an inference of intentional discrimination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tauro

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.