· 7/20/2006
Sampson v. Town of Salisbury
Citations
- 441 F. Supp. 2d 271
- 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49649
- 2006 WL 2023282
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- granting defendants summary judgment on plaintiffs’ equal-protection claim because plaintiffs had “asserted nothing more than disparaté treatment, which is insufficient to support an inference of intentional discrimination”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tauro
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.