District Court of Appeal of Florida· 10/31/2001
Sampson v. State
Citations
- 798 So. 2d 824
- 2001 WL 1334373
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the issue of a general notice of enhancement was not preserved for appellate review because the defendant did not argue that the notice was deficient
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cope and Goderich, Jj., and Nesbitt, Senior Judge
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Washington v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-02-09· cited 32×
- Cooper v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-15· cited 29×
- Reese v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-06· cited 18×
- Butts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-23· cited 5×
- Forcelledo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-03-16· cited 3×
- Ragin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-10-18· cited 2×
- Willoughby v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-19· cited 1×
- Powell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-06-15
- GARDINO MARTINEZ MESA v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-02-08
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.