Sampson v. Kaufman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “general plan doctrine” did not apply beyond point at which “definite restriction” expired by its terms
• failure by burdened and benefitted homeowners to renew restrictive covenants prior to termination date rendered restrictions “inoperative”
• a subsequent agreement among lot owners to extend restrictions, four years after restrictive covenants expired, “could not be an agreement between those who signed same and defendants, who did not or refused to sign

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).