Samplid Enterprises, Inc. v. First Vermont Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that we may affirm on different “rationale” from trial court where the judgment was otherwise “proper”
• noting that, when reviewing motion for summary judgment, facts are viewed in light most favorable to nonmoving party
• noting “the term ‘given, granted, sequestered or appropriated to a public... use’ in § 462 refers to the use made of the property by the legal owner” (alteration in original)
• “In determining whether a genuine issue of fact exists, the nonmoving party receives the benefit of all reasonable doubts and inferences.”
• this Court may affirm a lower court judgment where the right result was reached for the wrong reason
• we may affirm judgment on rationale different from trial court where result was otherwise correct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).