Samples v. Georgia Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that fact that plaintiff’s husband purchased automobile in name that he used in doing business does not contradict fact that he owned automobile as individual
• the car plaintiff was driving was not covered as a temporary substitute because it was titled to her husband’s trade name, which was as if he owned it individually

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).