Sample, Brandon v. Bur Pris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that FOIA required production of records in electronic format, as requested, even though paper copies had already been provided
• distinguishing between the BOP’s role as a FOIA administrator and its role as a custodian of inmates
• “Relying on pre-1996 cases, this Court held that since Martinez was afforded a meaningful opportunity to review his PSRs and to take notes on them, FOIA did not entitle him to retain a copy of them.” (cleaned up)
• “Once BOP, in its role as FOIA respondent, has provided the records [sought by plaintiff], its FOIA obligation is 2 complete.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).