Skip to main content
· 4/11/2012

Samper v. PROVIDENCE ST. VINCENT MEDICAL CENTER

Citations

  • 675 F.3d 1233
  • 26 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 11
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 7278
  • 2012 WL 1194141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “on- site” attendance was an essential function of the job for a neo-natal nurse who provided direct patient care
  • concluding that “on-site” attendance was an essential function of the job for a neo-natal nurse who provided direct patient care
  • holding that regular attendance constituted essential function even though employer’s attendance policy “allow[ed] for some unplanned absences”
  • holding that accommodation that exempts a plaintiff 22 from an essential function of his job is not reasonable
  • holding that an employer was entitled to summary judgment where on-site attendance was an essential function for a nurse and the plaintiffs requested schedule would not have enabled her to perform, that function sufficiently
  • finding that, in the case of a neo-natal intensive care nurse, showing up for work “really is essential”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guy, McKeown, Tallman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.