Skip to main content
· 12/13/1991

Sampen v. Dabrowski

Citations

  • 584 N.E.2d 493
  • 222 Ill. App. 3d 918
  • 165 Ill. Dec. 314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that defendant's appraisal report was a professional opinion and subjective estimate and thus not actionable under the Illinois consumer fraud law
  • concluding that defendant’s appraisal report was a professional opinion and subjective estimate and thus not actionable under the Illinois consumer fraud law
  • explaining that where a valuation was explicitly labeled an estimate, there was no deception
  • where a valuation is explicitly la- 4 No. 18-2130 beled an estimate, there is no deception
  • where a valuation is explicitly labeled an estimate, there is no deception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Egan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.