· 12/13/1991
Sampen v. Dabrowski
Citations
- 584 N.E.2d 493
- 222 Ill. App. 3d 918
- 165 Ill. Dec. 314
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that defendant's appraisal report was a professional opinion and subjective estimate and thus not actionable under the Illinois consumer fraud law
- concluding that defendant’s appraisal report was a professional opinion and subjective estimate and thus not actionable under the Illinois consumer fraud law
- explaining that where a valuation was explicitly labeled an estimate, there was no deception
- where a valuation is explicitly la- 4 No. 18-2130 beled an estimate, there is no deception
- where a valuation is explicitly labeled an estimate, there is no deception
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Egan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.