Skip to main content
· 1/19/2007

Samour, Inc. v. Board of Election Commissioners

Citations

  • 866 N.E.2d 137
  • 224 Ill. 2d 530
  • 310 Ill. Dec. 326
  • 2007 Ill. LEXIS 7

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where the case does not involve administrative review, a trier of fact’s determination of whether a statute was complied with is reviewed de novo
  • “fact finder is in the best position to evaluate the conduct and demeanor of the witnesses”
  • “fact finder is in the best position to evaluate the conduct and demeanor of the witnesses”
  • this court will not substitute our “judgment on credibility matters because the fact finder is in the best position to evaluate the conduct and demeanor of the witnesses.”
  • “this court has only applied the clearly erroneous standard to decisions of administrative agencies. [Citation.] In all other civil cases, we review legal issues de novo and factual issues under a manifest weight of the evidence standard”
  • a finding is manifestly erroneous when the opposite conclusion is clearly evident

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kilbride

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.