Sammt v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[p]ersonal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant is 11 proper if permitted by a state’s long-arm statute and if the exercise of that jurisdiction does 12 not violate federal due process.”
• when considering the medical opinion evidence, the 11 ALJ must do more than state a conclusion; rather, the ALJ must “set forth his own 12 interpretations and explain why they, rather than the doctors’, are correct.”
• “The ‘law of the case’ doctrine requires every court to follow the decisions of the courts that are higher in the judicial hierarchy. [Citations omitted.] The doctrine applies to issues previously decided . . . either explicitly or by necessary implication.”
• allegations contained in a complaint can constitute judicial admissions
• applying interpretation to garnishment proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).