Skip to main content
· 6/17/1986

Samilo v. PA. INSURANCE DEPT.

Citations

  • 510 A.2d 412
  • 98 Pa. Commw. 232
  • 1986 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 2290

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where some things are specifically designated in a statute, things omitted should be understood as having been excluded; “expressio unius est exelusio alter-áis”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crumlish, Colins, Rogers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.