Same Case — On an Application for Re-hearing

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “to the extent that the ALJ rejected portions of the examining physicians’ opinions which were transparently based on some of plaintiff's self-reported diagnoses symptoms, the ALJ’s decision to give short shrift to those portions was particularly appropriate.”
• affirming despite the fact that “[t]he ALJ’s decision contain[ed] a typographical error, describing the amended onset date as December 1, 2014—which would postdate the decision itself’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).