Sambrine v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that blood results obtained after defendant affirmatively refused request for blood violated implied consent statute irrespective of Schmerber
• holding that blood results obtained after defendant affirmatively refused request for blood violated implied consent statute irrespective of Schmerber
• supreme court noted that there is no provision in statute that a driver be informed of his right to refuse
• blood sample taken from a lawfully arrested DUI defendant after he refused a breath and blood test unauthorized under the implied consent statutes and thus results of scientific test performed on such sample were inadmissible in evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).