Samansky v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that res ipsa loquitur applies in the strict liability context
• reversing summary judgment where the plaintiff's expert rendered a specific opinion that a defect in the product was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injury
• \the absence of the product at trial is not fatal to the plaintiff's [claim for strict liability]\
• disputed questions of fact preclude dismissal of a complaint under section 2-619
• disputed questions of fact preclude dismissal of a complaint under section 2- 619
• referring to the “Tweedy doctrine”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).