Sam v. Estate of Sam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a state is not required to extend immunity and comity only dictates doing so if it does not contradict the forum state's public policy
• recognizing that a state is not required to extend immunity and comity only dictates doing so if it does not contradict the forum state's public policy
• recognizing that a state is not required to extend immunity and comity, and only dictating doing so if it does not contradict the forum state's public policy
• recognizing that a state is not required to extend immunity and comity, and only dictating doing so if it does not contradict the forum state's public policy
• recognizing that “other states will likely consider our decisional law on the subject of comity” and “may be reluctant to extend immunity to our state if we have previously declined to extend immunity to a sister state”
• “New Mexico has a particular interest in providing compensation or access to the courts to residents of the state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).