Sam Senter Farms, Inc. v. James Talcott, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the “principal author of the legislation” at issue filed an amicus brief but relying on her official record statements at the time of consideration of the bill
• providing that injury in fact cannot be based on speculation or conjecture
• “Standing is a threshold jurisdictional question which must be addressed prior to and independent of the merits of a party’s claims.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• reversing and remanding agency determination for further consideration where agency order did not explain choice made from among conflicting financial analyses and did not take into account statutory requirement of community reinvestment to maximum feasible extent
• “Explanation in sufficient detail also is required for meaningful judicial review and for there to be a basis for judicial deference to agency determinations.”
• \The requirement that the decision be fully and clearly explained ... is necessary for meaningful judicial review of and deference to the agency's decision.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).