D.C. Circuit· 8/4/2015

Sam Osborn v. Visa Inc.

Citations

418 U.S. App. D.C. 193
797 F.3d 1057
2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13529
2015 WL 4619874

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding plaintiffs did “more than allege ‘mere membership’” where complaint alleged defendants used their governance role to force association to take anticompetitive actions that served their economic interests
holding plaintiffs did “more than allege ‘mere membership’” where complaint alleged defendants used their governance role to force association to take anticompetitive actions that served their economic interests
noting that “[a]s a technical matter, the District Court lack[s] authority to rule on the merits of the Rule 15(a) motion [if] it did not modify its final judgment dismissing [the case]”
noting that “[a]s a technical matter, the District Court lacked authority to rule 12 on the merits of the Rule 15(a) motion because it did not modify its final judgment dismissing those cases.”
finding basic economic assumptions sufficient to satisfy injury requirement where plaintiffs’ “sorts of assumptions [we]re provable at trial”
in discussing standing, noting that plaintiffs rely on certain economic assumptions about supply and demand that are provable at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tatel, Srinivasan, Wilkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.