Sam Osborn v. Visa Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiffs did “more than allege ‘mere membership’” where complaint alleged defendants used their governance role to force association to take anticompetitive actions that served their economic interests
• holding plaintiffs did “more than allege ‘mere membership’” where complaint alleged defendants used their governance role to force association to take anticompetitive actions that served their economic interests
• noting that “[a]s a technical matter, the District Court lack[s] authority to rule on the merits of the Rule 15(a) motion [if] it did not modify its final judgment dismissing [the case]”
• noting that “[a]s a technical matter, the District Court lacked authority to rule 12 on the merits of the Rule 15(a) motion because it did not modify its final judgment dismissing those cases.”
• finding basic economic assumptions sufficient to satisfy injury requirement where plaintiffs’ “sorts of assumptions [we]re provable at trial”
• in discussing standing, noting that plaintiffs rely on certain economic assumptions about supply and demand that are provable at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).