Skip to main content
· 4/14/1986

Sam Anderson, Jr. v. United States

Citations

  • 788 F.2d 517
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23883

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • for purposes of prosecution’s duty to reveal favorable evidence to accused, review of polygraph statements in camera proper in determining whether the statements were material to guilt or punishment
  • \Whether the statements were material to [the defendant's] guilt or punishment is a question that the district court should have determined by reviewing the tapes and the polygraph statements in camera. \
  • “Whether the statements were material to [the defendant’s] guilt or punishment is a question that the district court should have determined by reviewing the tapes and the polygraph statements in camera.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Wollman, Regan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.