Salzer v. SSM Health Care of Oklahoma Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opining that the connection between Cates's claims and her ERISA plan was \too attenuated\ to support complete preemption
• recognizing the two-part test set forth in Davila for determining whether state law claims are preempted by ERISA
• explaining that “the propriety of removal is judged on the complaint as it stands at the time of the removal” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• opining that the connection between Cates's claims and her ERISA plan was \too attenuated\ to support complete preemption
• opining that the connection between Cates's claims and her ERISA plan was \too attenuated\ to support complete preemption
• permitting a plan beneficiary to bring an ERISA claim against a healthcare provider to enforce rights under his plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).