Salvo v. Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a court “need not scrutinize the time spent on each itemized task for which fees are requested.”
• ordering full offset of EAJA fees recovered following sentence six remand without discussion, even though some of the EAJA fees appear to have been for administrative work
• “Attorneys are not entitled to fees under the EAJA for work that is unreasonable, redundant, excessive, or unnecessary.”
• “[M]any district courts in the Second Circuit find that twenty to forty hours is a reasonable amount of time to spend on routine Social Security cases . . . .”
• “Although many district courts in the Second Circuit find that twenty to forty hours is a reasonable amount of time to spend on routine Social Security cases, fees have regularly been awarded far in excess of this amount.”
• “Although many district courts in the Second Circuit find that twenty to forty hours is a reasonable amount of time to spend on routine Social Security cases, fees have regularly been awarded far in excess of this amount.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).