Salvati v. Heckler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court’s grant of summary judgment was improper after another judge previously denied a Rule 12(b)(6) motion on the same legal issue
• finding that lay knowledge and experience was sufficient to understand that surgical connection of the patient’s anus to her vagina was the product of negligence
• affirming dismissal of punitive damages claim under Rule 56 where plaintiffs failed to “present any evidence that defendants’ conduct in this case was willful, wanton, malicious, or fraudulent”
• “[E]ven when a complaint facially complies with Rule 9(j) by including a statement pursuant to Rule 9(j

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).