Salvador v. Meese

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• knowing misrepresentation of ownership by out-of-State defendant constituted basis for personal jurisdiction
• investors alleged that attorney visited Massachusetts and made intentional misrepresentations that induced them to invest in Florida swampland; fact that this was attorney’s sole contact with forum did not defeat jurisdiction
• “[P]laintiffs offer no proof that [purported agents] were acting either on behalf of the [principal], subject to their control or with their consent. Consequently, the court does not consider [them] to be agents”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).