Salvador Fernandez Mirola v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that landowners along the planned path of a natural gas pipeline could not challenge the constitutionality of the Natural Gas Act because it was “the means by which they seek to vacate the granting of the Certificate”
• “FERC’s inability to resolve Plaintiffs’ constitutional 14 claims does not mean that the statutory scheme deprives Plaintiffs of meaningful judicial review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).