Salvador Coronado v. State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that jurisdiction under § 1581(i) was improper where accelerated disposition under § 1515(b) was available to the importer
• considering whether a protest which the agency failed to allow or deny within the two-year statutory time period must be deemed allowed
• “[W]hen Congress intends there to be consequences for noncompliance with statutory deadlines for government action, it says so expressly.”
• “[W]hen Congress intends there to be consequences for noncompliance with statutory deadlines for government action, it says so expressly.”
• deadline was directory and failing to meet that deadline did not strip Customs of its power to allow or deny a protest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).