Salvador Andrade v. Loretta E. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that there was no risk of torture where the petitioner’s tattoos were not gang-related, and petitioner was not a former gang member
• stating that gang tattoos may provide support for a CAT claim when they are conspicuous
• explaining that, under Cole, an agency must give “reasoned consideration” of the evidence underlying a CAT claim
• substantial evidence supported the agency’s finding that petitioner being deported from a wealthier country with “decorative, not gang-related” tattoos failed to establish a clear probability of torture
• substantial evidence supported denial of deferral of removal under CAT where petitioner failed to show more likely than not he would be subjected to torture upon return

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).